Difference between revisions of "Talk:Direct Address"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Why does Na'vi have a vocative particle and not a vocative case, in keeping with the other case aspects of the language?') |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why does Na'vi have a vocative particle and not a vocative case, in keeping with the other case aspects of the language? | Why does Na'vi have a vocative particle and not a vocative case, in keeping with the other case aspects of the language? | ||
+ | : Why not? Classical Arabic is the same. It has three cases (nominative, accusative, genitive) but uses a vocative particle, ''yaa''. Na'vi doesn't have to be like Latin or Greek. [[User:Wm.annis|Wm.annis]] 20:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Links == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The links are dead. What to do with them? [[User:KepekäNa'vi|KepekäNa'vi]] ([[User talk:KepekäNa'vi|talk]]) 10:45, 25 July 2015 (CDT) | ||
+ | : Good question. I usually try to find an alternative link to the source, but in this case, hmm... I'll have to talk with Tirea about it. [[User:Tìtstewan|Tìtstewan]] ([[User talk:Tìtstewan|talk]]) 12:31, 25 July 2015 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 25 July 2015
Why does Na'vi have a vocative particle and not a vocative case, in keeping with the other case aspects of the language?
- Why not? Classical Arabic is the same. It has three cases (nominative, accusative, genitive) but uses a vocative particle, yaa. Na'vi doesn't have to be like Latin or Greek. Wm.annis 20:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Links
The links are dead. What to do with them? KepekäNa'vi (talk) 10:45, 25 July 2015 (CDT)