Difference between revisions of "Talk:Direct Address"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Why does Na'vi have a vocative particle and not a vocative case, in keeping with the other case aspects of the language?') |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why does Na'vi have a vocative particle and not a vocative case, in keeping with the other case aspects of the language? | Why does Na'vi have a vocative particle and not a vocative case, in keeping with the other case aspects of the language? | ||
+ | : Why not? Classical Arabic is the same. It has three cases (nominative, accusative, genitive) but uses a vocative particle, ''yaa''. Na'vi doesn't have to be like Latin or Greek. [[User:Wm.annis|Wm.annis]] 20:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:00, 4 January 2010
Why does Na'vi have a vocative particle and not a vocative case, in keeping with the other case aspects of the language?
- Why not? Classical Arabic is the same. It has three cases (nominative, accusative, genitive) but uses a vocative particle, yaa. Na'vi doesn't have to be like Latin or Greek. Wm.annis 20:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)