Difference between revisions of "Talk:L E P/Miscellaneous function words"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Since he still has a huge back log of emails, I'd prefer if we could keep it here, as a reminder if nothing else. | :Since he still has a huge back log of emails, I'd prefer if we could keep it here, as a reminder if nothing else. | ||
:BTW, why do we have "like, as"? Don't we already have two words for that? [[User:Roger|Roger]] 23:02, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | :BTW, why do we have "like, as"? Don't we already have two words for that? [[User:Roger|Roger]] 23:02, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::We have ''like, as'' adpositions. The ones here are conjunctions. — [[User:Wm.annis|Wm.annis]] 02:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:56, 13 March 2010
Main editor for this category: Wm.annis
"Part of the whole" affix
Roger, can you please trim that list of examples, to give a broad feel for what you're thinking? Frommer'll know what you mean with a shorter list. — Wm.annis 22:39, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Since you've mailed this directly to Frommer, do we need it in our current list any longer? — Wm.annis 18:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Since he still has a huge back log of emails, I'd prefer if we could keep it here, as a reminder if nothing else.
- BTW, why do we have "like, as"? Don't we already have two words for that? Roger 23:02, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- We have like, as adpositions. The ones here are conjunctions. — Wm.annis 02:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
