Difference between revisions of "Talk:Resources"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'The discussion of the ASG could probably use some qualification. The Na'vi parts of the animal and plant guides is eccentric. We have no reasons to doubt the Weaving Song or th…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The discussion of the ASG could probably use some qualification. The Na'vi parts of the animal and plant guides is eccentric. We have no reasons to doubt the Weaving Song or the Hunt Song. The only problem with the word list is that many entries are uncertain about the part of speech and accenting. [[User:Wm.annis|Wm.annis]] 23:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC) | The discussion of the ASG could probably use some qualification. The Na'vi parts of the animal and plant guides is eccentric. We have no reasons to doubt the Weaving Song or the Hunt Song. The only problem with the word list is that many entries are uncertain about the part of speech and accenting. [[User:Wm.annis|Wm.annis]] 23:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Sounds good to me. Make it so! Alternately, add a link to another page where you can explain in greater detail? Either (or both) works for me. -- [[User:Erimeyz|Erimeyz]] 00:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:08, 20 January 2010
The discussion of the ASG could probably use some qualification. The Na'vi parts of the animal and plant guides is eccentric. We have no reasons to doubt the Weaving Song or the Hunt Song. The only problem with the word list is that many entries are uncertain about the part of speech and accenting. Wm.annis 23:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. Make it so! Alternately, add a link to another page where you can explain in greater detail? Either (or both) works for me. -- Erimeyz 00:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
