I agree the table works and is quite succinct but I think for some people it's difficult to grasp right off without much grammar vocabulary. So maybe we can include the table and then break it down with some English equivalents in the discussion? --Pixel 18:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- Absolutely! That sounds great. Wm.annis 18:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- This not in any way done yet but I did add the table. Still needs discussion about clusivity, and general explanation. :D --Pixel 20:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
po = it?
Unless I've missed something, I think we're still not sure if po can be used for it. Frommer has talked about this word on several occasions, and so far "he or she" has always been the definition. So I worry. — Wm.annis 17:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)